I was watching an interview with John Cleese from several years ago, and the topic of nudity in film came up. The host noted that he had heard of ‘frontal’ nudity, but wondered if there was a corresponding term for a view from the back. Mr. Cleese suggested the term ‘dorsal nudity.’ I know that’s not a real phrase, but by golly, it ought to be….
it.s mighty man !
I always thought it was “rear nudity” but then again I never gave it much consideration. I’m eager to find out who the nude guy in the tank is though.
Tek Support was supposedly a Sidekick to another Hero.
But he can build life-like robo squirrels. What if the “Hero” was actually a creation of his? What if they just found him?
That’s right, Tinker: ‘you check his vital signs, Bones; I’ll get his wallet.’
Oh, and I thought NYPD Blue had codified that as a ‘butt shot,’ although that idiom could become very confusing on a cop show that had any sort of sense of humor.
Regardless, it’s my opinion you made a half-assed job of it here, Mr. Langcaon. (insert rimshot)
If I had shown the full view, I would have had to called the page “Full Dorsal Nudity” instead…
Now that was a terrible pun.
Which brings up the real problem with FDN: nobody’s going to go for the companion phrase “Full Ventral Nudity.” Too much risk of people complaining afterwards they didn’t know that meant there was going to be ‘nekkid people prancin’ around.’
As-is, you run a risk, if you ever get the break you deserve, of someone thinking the hero in question is named ‘Dorsal.’
Well, if these guys want to start kicking @$$ and taking names, they’ve already got an exposed target for the former.